← Library
Madras High CourtWP/25390/2024disposed of

K.Sankaran v. The District Collector

2024-09-03Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.09.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.K.Sankaran 2.K.Balasubramanian ... Petitioners vs.

1.The District Collector, Thiruvarur.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kudavasal, Thiruvarur.

3.The Tahsildhar, Kudavasal Taluk, Thiruvarur District.

4.Panchapakesan 5.Padmapriya 6.Raghav ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider their representation dated 15.07.2024 by conducting an enquiry by modifying the patta No.173 or issue a fresh join patta by including our names in S.No.260/38 of Vishnupuram Village, Kudavasal Taluk, Tiruvarur District in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Bhuvaneswaran 1/4

For R1 to R3 : Mr.U.Baranidaran Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider their representation dated 15.07.2024 seeking modification of entry in Patta No.173 pertains to property situated in S.No.260/38 in Vishnupuram Village, Kudavasal Taluk, Tiruvarur District.

2. According to the petitioners, the above mentioned property originally belonged to their grandfather-Gopal Sastri and he had two sons namely G.Swaminathan and G.Krishnamoorthy. The petitioners are the sons of G.Krishnamoorthy. The respondents 4 to 6 are legal heirs of G.Swaminathan. It is the case of the petitioners that the patta for their ancestral property in S.No.260/38 stands only in the name of Swaminathan in Patta No.173. Therefore, the petitioners submitted a representation to the official respondents on 15.07.2024 seeking correction in the patta by including the name of their father-G.Krishnanoorthy or his legal heirs. The same has not been considered by the official respondents till date. Therefore, the petitioners are before this Court.

3. Mr.U.Baranidaran, learned Additional Government Pleader, who is 2/4

taking notice for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioners dated 15.07.2024 will be considered by the 3rd respondent on its own merit, after hearing the private respondents.

4. In view of the same, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.07.2024 and pass final orders on its own merit, after issuing necessary notice to the respondents 4 to 6, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

03.09.2024 (2/2) Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No dm 3/4

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dm To 1.The District Collector, Thiruvarur.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kudavasal, Thiruvarur.

3.The Tahsildhar, Kudavasal Taluk, Thiruvarur District.

03.09.2024 (2/2) 4/4