Thiru. N.A. Chinnasamy v. The Regional Transport

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.09.2017 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Writ Petition No.32130 of 2002 N.A.Chinnasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Regional Transport Authority, Salem 636 007.

2. R.Balasubramani

3. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in Appeal No.1004/2001/A4 dated 8.5.2002 on the file of the 3rd respondent herein confirming the order passed in Proceedings made in R.No.A3/8881/2001 dated 21.3.2001 on the file of the 1st respondent herein and quash the same. For petitioner : No appearance For 1st respondent : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Government Advocate

O R D E R

When the matter was listed on 25.07.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter was ordered to be posted next week and on 24.08.2017, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was ordered to be posted on 31.08.2017. Thereafter, when the matter was called on 01.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be posted on 04.09.2017 under the caption, ''for dismissal''. Even today i.e. on 4.9.2017, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter further. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar tsi To

1. The Regional Transport Authority, Salem 636 007.

2. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Madras-104.

+1 CC to The Govt. Pleader sr 64495.

W.P.No.32130 of 2002 VD(CO) sp(11/10/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/