Karthik v. Inspector Of Police

Crl.OP.No.23852 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.23852 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 392, 397 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.397 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and abused him in filthy language and snatched Rs.950/- from the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is having five previous cases pending against him. He would further submit that this is the third anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner. Earlier petitions filed by the petitioner were dismissed. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.23852 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the bad antecedents of the petitioner and also the earlier petitions filed by the petitioner were dismissed by this Court and that there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 30.09.2022 mn Crl.O.P.No.23852 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis