P.Murugan v. The State Rep By Its,

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.330 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to dispute on account of non payment of commission in a real estate transaction, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant and also intimidated. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that due to previous enmity, the defacto complainant had picked up quarrel with the petitioners and lodged a false complaint against the petitioners. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that due to dispute on account of non payment

of commission in a real estate transaction, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant and also intimidated. He would further submit that there is no previous case pending against them. Thereby, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned Counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions; 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sankari on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.

dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, for a period of four weeks and thereafter, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

vkr P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC;

23.09.2022 vkr