Madras High CourtCRP PD/1647/2004dismissed as infructuous

G.V.Sudhakar, S/O.G.V.Radha- v. Audilakshmi, S/O.Radhakrishnan

2015-02-25Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.02.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM C.R.P.(PD) NO.1647 OF 2004 1.G.V.Sudhakar 2.G.V.Ananthakrishnan 3.G.V.Kothandaraman

...Petitioners (Landlords)

Vs.

1.Audilakshmi 2.Nandaiah 3.Subramani 4.Chandraiah @ Chandran

...Respondents (Tenants)

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the endorsement of the XI Court of Small Causes, Chennai, in M.P.No.375/2004 in R.C.O.P.No.1826/1998 dated 24.08.2004 in directing the disposal of the application under Section 11(4) of the Rent Control Act together with the main application.

For Petitioners :

Mr.V.Raghavachari

O R D E R

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the landlords have already taken possession the tenanted premises. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TK To The XI Judge Court of Small Causes Chennai.

1 CC to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate SR.No. 10475 C.R.P.(PD) NO.1647 OF 2004 ALA (CO) PSI (12.03.2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/