Balu @ Kadamba Balu v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.23295 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No23295 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 326, 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.224 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner had intimidated, abused and assaulted the defacto complainant with iron rod, due to which, he had sustained injuries. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. Due to a wordy quarrel, a false complaint has been given against the petitioner. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.23295 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

shk

4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner had waylaid and assaulted the defacto complainant with iron rod, due to which, he had sustained injuries. He would submit that the injured is still in hospital. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also taking note of the fact that the injured is still in hospital, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed for the present.

26.09.2022 shk Crl.O.P.No23295 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis