← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/19479/2023granted

Murali v. Police Departmentinspector Of Police Periyapalayam Police Stationthiruvalluvar

2023-09-05Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman4 pages

Crl.O.P.No.19479 of 2023 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

The Petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the Respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 324 & 506(ii) @ 341, 294(b), 324, 506(ii) & 307 of IPC in Crime No.488 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 15.07.2023 the Defacto Complainant was assaulted by the Petitioner using knife and so he sustained injuries and admitted in the hospital on the same day. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Defacto Complainant came to Petitioner's place and damaged the water tap, when the same was questioned by the 1st Petitioner, the Defacto Complainant used filthy language against him and attacked all the Petitioners.

Due to which, the 1st Petitioner lodged first complaint before the Respondent in Cr.No.487 of 2023 against the Defacto Complainant. Hence, the learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the Respondent would submit that the co-accused already obtained Anticipatory bail before this Court. He is vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. 5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either sides and the nature and gravity of the alleged offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Uthukottai, Tiruvallur on condition that the Petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the Petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the Petitioners shall report before the Respondent Police, on everyday at 10.30 am for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required; [c] the Petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or 2/4

witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the Petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

05.09.2023 sai 3/4

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

sai Crl.O.P.No.19479 of 2023 Dated: 05.09.2023 4/4