Karthick @ Porikarthick v. State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.08.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 392, 397 & 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.417 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner waylaid the de-facto complainant near the TASMAC shop and abused him in a filthy language and robbed a sum of Rs.2000/- and a cell phone from him. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 1/4

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender and there are 4 previous cases for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC as against him. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. The previous cases against the petitioner are listed hereunder:- S.No Crime No.

Sections 1.

120/2022 379 of IPC 2.

157/2022 379 of IPC 3.

191/2022 379 of IPC 4.

261/2022 379 of IPC

6. Heard both the learned Counsel and perused the materials available on record.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel and that the petitioner 2/4

has got 4 previous cases against him, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed for the present.

27.09.2022 rgi 3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

rgi 27.09.2022 4/4