← Library
Madras High CourtWP/25146/2024disposed of

M.C. Rathinam v. The Principal Secretary To Government Of Tamilnadu

2024-09-24Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar,Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.09.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.POORNIMA WP.No.25146/2024 & WMP.Nos.27465 & 27466/2024 M.C.Rathinam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu O/o.Housing & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Commissioner/Member Secretary Pollachi Local Planning Authority Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi, Coimbatore District 642 001.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the special revision/application filed on 07.08.2024 under Sections 80A and 80A[3] of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 by giving personal hearing to the petitioner and within the reasonable time to be fixed by this

Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.V.Muthuvisakan For R1 : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, AGP For R2 : Mr.B.Anand, Standing counsel

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,] (1)Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.B.Anand, learned Standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent. (2)The limited prayer in this writ petition is to give direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the special revision filed by petitioner under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, after hearing the petitioner.

(3)Even though this Court has no difficulty in issuing direction to dispose of the special revision stated to have been filed by the petitioner, learned standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent states that pursuant to the enforcement action taken by the respondents under Sections 56 and 57

of the Act, 1971, which is challenged in the special revision, the respondents have locked and sealed the premises of the petitioner. (4)Considering the fact that the respondents have already sealed the premises, this Court cannot grant any interim order of injunction as prayed for. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner hence further pray that respondents may be directed to remove the lock and seal and maintain status quo till the disposal of the special revision filed under Section 80-A of the Act.

(5)Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the special revision petition stated to have been filed by the petitioner under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, on merits and in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of personal hearing within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time the special revision is disposed of by the 1st respondent, the respondents are directed to maintain status quo. Since it is now represented that the respondents had already sealed the premises, to maintain status quo as on the date when the special revision is filed, the 2nd respondent is directed to

deseal the premises within a period of two days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is open to the respondents to take further action in accordance with the final order that may be passed by the 1st respondent in the statutory revision. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [S.S.S.R., J.] [R.P., J.] 24.09.2024 AP Internet : Yes To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu O/o.Housing & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Commissioner/Member Secretary Pollachi Local Planning Authority Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi, Coimbatore District 642 001.

S.S. SUNDAR, J.,

and R.POORNIMA, J., AP 24.09.2024