Thilagan v. The State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No. 3 5 0 2 of 2 0 1 6 K. KALYANA S U NDARAM, J.

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(i) of IPC read with 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No. 60 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners have attacked the de-facto complainant and caused injuries.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent person and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against the petitioners.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

K. KALYANA S U NDARAM, J.

vsg

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Walajapet and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 1 8. 0 2. 2 0 1 6 vsg Crl.O.P.No. 3 5 0 2 of 2 0 1 6