Sambath v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.3511 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A.1 & A.2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Section 399 of IPC in Crime No.30 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused have made preparations to commit dacoity. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners are innocent and based on the confession of the co-accused, they have been implicated as accused in this case. 4.Learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioners have no bad antecedents and A-1 to A-4 were already arrested and released on bail. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

rgr 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police twice a day i.e. at 10.00 a.m. and 6.00p.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 23.02.2016 rgr Crl.O.P.No.3511 of 2016