New Sangeetha Restaurant v. M/S.Sangeetha Caterers And Consultants Llp, Represented By Its Designated Partners

A.Nos.4575 and 4576 of 2022 in C.S.No.302 of 2014 A.Nos.4575 and 4576 of 2022 in C.S.No.302 of 2014 M.SUNDAR.J., This common order will now dispose of captioned applications.

2. In this order, the parties shall be referred to by their respective ranks in the main suit for the sake of convenience and clarity.

3. Mr.R.Tamizh Arasan, learned counsel representing Mr.L.Rajasekar, counsel on record for plaintiffs and Mr.K.M.Anand, learned counsel for the lone defendant are before this Commercial Division.

4. Trial is underway and captioned applications have been taken out seeking leave qua receiving one document and to recall DW1 for marking the said document. Learned counsel for plaintiff very fairly submits that while he is not opposing the recall application, the application for leave to receive document can be allowed subject to proof and relevance. There is no difficulty in putting in this caveat. M.SUNDAR.J., 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Nos.4575 and 4576 of 2022 in C.S.No.302 of 2014 gpa

5. The sequitur is A.No.4576 of 2022 ordered as prayed for. A.No.4575 of 2022 is ordered subject to the caveat that document received can be marked as an exhibit subject to proof and relevance. There shall be no order as to costs.

02.11.2022 gpa A.Nos.4575 and 4576 of 2022 in C.S.No.302 of 2014 (1/2) 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis