P.Kandasamy v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.23576 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of IPC @ 307 of IPC, in Crime No.269 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity on account of a civil dispute, the petitioners brutally attacked the de-facto complainant. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they are no way connected with the alleged offence. He would further submit that it is a case and case in counter. Hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that 3 persons had brutally assaulted the de-facto complainant and the injuries sustained by the de-facto complainant are very

serious in nature. However, the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that the case has now been altered to Section 307 of IPC and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 28.09.2022 mpl

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

mpl Crl.O.P.No.23576 of 2022 28.09.2022