← Library
Madras High CourtWP/27645/2019dismissed for nonprosecution

V.M.Ashok Kumar v. The District Collector,

2025-09-24Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Nos.27645 & 27647 of 2019 1.V.M.Ashok Kumar 2.V.M.Rajashekar 3.A.R.Vidhyavathi 4.Chitra Pradeep Chowdry 5.Chaitra Amarnath Bidalur Represented by their Power of Attorney Sharath Chandra .....

Petitioners Vs 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri.

2.The Land Acquisition Officer, cum Special Tashildar, SIPCOT, Hosur, Krishnagiri.

.....

Respondents Common Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to refer matter concerning acquisition of the land in Survey Number 138/1 measuring 0.71.5 hectares, Survey Number 439/3 measuring 0.24.5 hectares and Survey Number 439/4 measuring 0.22.5 hectares at Moranapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishngiri District in respect of the subject matter of the award proceedings on the file of the second respondent under Award Nos.4/2007 and 3/2007 under Section 8 of the Tamil Nadu Act 10/1999.

For Petitioner (in both W.Ps) : No appearnance For Respondents (in both W.Ps): Mr.N.Naveen Kumar Government Advocate COMMON

ORDER

These Writ Petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to refer the matter relating to the acquisition of lands in S.No. 138/1 measuring 0.71.5 hectares, S.No. 439/3 measuring 0.24.5 hectares and S.No. 439/4 measuring 0.22.5 hectares, situated at Moranapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishngiri District, in respect of the award proceedings on the file of the second respondent under Award Nos.4/2007 and 3/2007 passed under Section 8 of the Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the entire case bundle had already been handed over to the petitioner along with change of vakalath. So far, the petitioner failed to engage any counsel on their behalf. Today, when the matter was called, neither the petitioner nor any counsel appeared before this Court. It clearly shows that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing these cases. 3.Hence, both the Writ Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs.

24.09.2025 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Lpp

To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri.

2.The Land Acquisition Officer, cum Special Tashildar, SIPCOT, Hosur, Krishnagiri.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, Lpp W.P.Nos.27645 & 27647 of 2019 24.09.2025