Kannan v. State Represented By The Inspector Of Police

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 426, 468, 469, 471, 488 of I.P.C in Crime No.Not Known of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is acting as a General Secretary under Human Right Cell, based on that he approached the online website named Anti-Corruption and Human Rights Council, as they insisted the petitioner at presented the document related to social welfare programme and pay Rs.15,000/- and obtained Doctorate. Later, the petitioner came to know that doctorate obtained himself was fake regarding the same he registered a case vide C.C.No.5/2023 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore and the same is dismissed. Hence the case.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent would submit that the investigation is completed and the charge sheet will be filed shortly. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the FIR.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, considering the medical condition of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Allikulam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on

further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, at 10.30 a.m., as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

31.08.2023 nvi RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

nvi 31.08.2023