Kangayen, v. The State Rep.

Crl.M.P.No.11817 of 2024 and Crl. A. No.948 of 2024 M. NIRMAL KUMAR.J., This petition has been filed seeking to amend the bail satisfaction Court as Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Vellore, Vellore District instead of Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Thiruvannamalai in the order of this Court made in Crl.M.P.No.10422 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.948 of 2024 dated 14.08.2024.

2. The petitioners / accused were granted suspension of sentence and bail vide order dated 14.08.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.10422 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.948 of 2024 by this Court. The counsel for the petitioners submits that at the time of filing, the petitioners had wrongly mentioned the conviction Court as Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Thiruvannamalai. It would have been mentioned as Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Vellore, Vellore District. Though, this Court had granted bail on 14.08.2024, the same could not be executed since there is mistake in the order. Hence, they filed the present petition. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M. NIRMAL KUMAR.J., ab

3. The Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submits that the mistake has been committed by the petitioners at the time of filing the petition and hence, the same is reflected in the order.

4. This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the petition; and the bail and suspension of sentence granted to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Thiruvannamalai shall be read as Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Vellore, Vellore District and accordingly, this petition is ordered.

22.08.2024 ab Issue Order Copy Today (i.e., on 22.08.2024) Crl.M.P.No.11817 of 2024 and Crl. A. No.948 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis