Vanjinathan v. The State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.23877 of 2021 VANJINATHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB-I, TEAM-XII, BANK FRAUD INVESTIGATION, CHENNAI.

(CRIME NO.179/2021) For Petitioner : M/S.D.ASHOK KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.GOKULAKRISHNAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 120-b, 420, 465, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC in Crime No.179 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons had created a forged document and grabbed the property belongs to the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint was registered.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that one subramanian settled the land to his daughter namely Mrs.Yamunarani Thanikachalam, on the same day, she https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

given power of attoryney to one Mr.Kumar to sell the property. Hence, the petitioner and his wife were cheated by one Mr.Kumar, who is the 3rd accused in the FIR. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner along with other accused persons had created a forged document and obtained a loan for a sum of Rs.2.20 crores. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. On perusal of records, it is seen that the petitioner along with other accused persons fabricated all the documents, sale deed was created and obtained a loan for a sum of Rs.2.20 crores. On seeing the conduct of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 09/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCB-I, TEAM-XII, BANK FRAUD INVESTIGATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.D.ASHOK KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.23877/2021 Date :09/12/2021 RW 29/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/