Sivagami v. The State Rep.By

Crl.O.P.No.3848 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-4 and A-5, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 447, 294[b] and 506[i] of IPC in Crime No.65 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners had abused the de facto complainant with filthy language and also criminally intimidated him.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.Learned Government Advocate [Criminal side] appearing for the respondent submitted that no one sustained injury and there is no previous case as against the petitioners.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury and there is no previous case as against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

sri 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranipet, Vellore District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 26.02.2016 sri Crl.O.P.No.3848 of 2016