T.Mani v. The District Collector

W.M.P.Nos.30929 & 30936 of 2025 in W.P.Nos.27608 & 27615 of 2025 M.SUNDAR, J., and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) This common order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petitions' [hereinafter 'WMPs' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned WMPs have been filed with prayer to dispense with production of 'notices dated 19.05.2025 issued by the third respondent' [hereinafter 'impugned notices' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

3. Mr.S.Patrick, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners, is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioners submits that the original impugned notices were not readily available with writ petitioners at the time of filing of captioned writ petitions and therefore, photocopies of the impugned notices were filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMPs.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.SUNDAR, J., and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned notices is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMPs are ordered as prayed for. [M.S.J.,] [H.C.J.,] 23.07.2025 (2/2) mk W.M.P.Nos.30929 & 30936 of 2025 in W.P.Nos.27608 & 27615 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis