B.Baskaran v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.23625 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.198 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity on account of a civil dispute, the petitioner along with other accused persons had attacked the de-facto complainant. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the alleged offence. He would further submit that it is a case and case in counter. Hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that due to previous enmity on account of a civil dispute, the petitioner along with other accused persons had attacked the defacto complainant. He would further submit that the injured is still in hospital

and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that the injured is still in the hospital, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner for the present.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 28.09.2022 mpl

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

mpl Crl.O.P.No.23625 of 2022 28.09.2022