M. Bagadaram, v. State Rep. By The Inspector

Crl.O.P.No. 4 0 2 9 of 2 0 1 6 K. KALYANA S U NDARAM, J.

The petitioner, who is arrayed as second accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 411 of IPC in Crime No.2192 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that petitioner is arrayed as A3. A1 and A2 have stolen eight sovereign of gold from the complainant's house and handed over to this petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the property had not been recovered so far. It is further submitted that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

K.KALYANA S U NDARAM, J smi 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 1 7. 0 3. 2 0 1 6 smi Crl.O.P.No. 4 0 2 9 of 2 0 1 6