Rangasami Naidu v. Alamelu

C.M.P.Nos.6519 & 6532 of 2022 in S.A.Nos.1422 & 1423 of 2003 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

Both these applications have been filed consequent to the death of the appellant Rangasami Naidu.

2.In the affidavit filed, it had been stated that the appellant had died on 16.07.2021 and the death certificate had been received only recently. Further, it had been stated that there is no delay in filling these applications. The legal representatives of the appellant are sought to be brought on record as appellants 2 to 9.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the respondents. 4.In view of the fact that since the appeals had been admitted and substantial questions of law have been framed, it is only appropriate that the legal representatives of the appellant are afforded an opportunity to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

sms participate in the second appeal and a duty is also cast on the Court to answer the substantial questions of law. Viewed from that particular angle, the applications are allowed.

sms 19.07.2022 C.M.P.Nos.6519 & 6532 of 2022 in S.A.Nos.1422 & 1423 of 2003 (1⁄2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis