Manjula v. V.Ezhil Saravanan

CMP No.19839 of 2023 in CMA.SR.No. 110231 of 2023 N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J The 1st respondent remained ex-parte even before the Tribunal and hence, notice is dispensed with. The respondents 2 and 3 have been served with the notice and they are represented through counsel.

2.This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 166 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and perused the records.

4.Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 166 days is condoned.

5.The name of the counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 shall be printed in the cause list at the time of admission.

6.It is made clear that for the period of delay of 166 days, the appellants will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal.

04.06.2024 ub (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis