P.Senthilnathan v. M.Suganya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 20.02.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN CRP.No. 2989 of 2021 and CMP.Nos. 21323 & 21325 of 2021
1. P. Senthilnathan
2. N. Ponnaiyan
3. Sangeetha ... Petitioners
Versus
M. Suganya ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prays to quash the complaint against the petitioners pending before the learned Additional Mahila Court (Judicial Magistrate), Salem in DVC.No. 60 of 2020.
For petitioners : Mr. C. Prabakaran For Respondent : Mr. M. Padmanaban ----
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that the DVC.No.60 of 2020 filed by the respondent/wife against the revision petitioners herein before the learned
Additional Mahila Court (Judicial Magistrate), Salem, had been dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court and therefore, the relief sought for by the revision petitioners in this Revision has now become infructuous and to that effect, he has also produced a xerox copy of the E-Court status dated 31.01.2023.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous as settled out of Court. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.
20.02.2023 Index : yes/no Speaking order : Yes/No msm To
1. The Additional Mahila Court (Judicial Magistrate), Salem.
2. The Section Officer, High Court of Madras.
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
msm CRP.No. 2989 of 2021 20.02.2023