K.Kafeelur Rahuman @ Kathil v. State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC in Crime No.631 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused in this case are running an employment agency of sending people abroad and had taken Rs.3,00,000/- from the defacto complainant and thereafter, fabricated fake Visa and work order and cheated the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit the first and second petitioners are only staff members of A1 and the third petitioner is not even a staff of the said agency and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence. He would further submit that the petitioners are no way connected with the case and they have been falsely implicated by the respondent police. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to

the petitioners.

4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioners joined together with main accused and advertised for obtaining jobs at abroad, had approached the defacto complainant and received a sum or Rs.3,00,000/- and apart from the defacto complainant they cheated other persons to the tune of Rs.3,60,000/- and thereafter they have fabricated fake Visa and work order, cheated the defacto complainant. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Taking into account the nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

01.11.2022 ata A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

ata 01.11.2022