Dillibabu v. State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.08.2022, for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 336, 392, 397 & 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.540 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 17.08.2022, the petitioners waylaid the defacto complainant and threatened him at knife point and robbed a sum of Rs.1160/- from the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that on 17.08.2022, the petitioners waylaid the defacto complainant and threatened him at knife point and robbed a sum of Rs.1160/- from the defacto complainant. He would also submit that the first petitioner has 11 previous cases as against him and the 2nd petitioner has 15 previous cases as against him and he is also an History Sheeter in H.S.6 of 2021. Therefore, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both the learned Counsel and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel and also the fact that the 1st petitioner has got 11 previous cases and the 2nd petitioner has got 15 previous cases and he is also an history sheeter in H.S.No.6 of

2021 and also the fact that very recently the petitioners have been arrested, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 30.09.2022 rgi

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

rgi 30.09.2022