P.Sridharan, v. State Rep By The

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.6115 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.6592 of 2017 P.Sridharan

...Petitioner

-Vs1.State represented by the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, D3 Kanagamma Chathiram Police Station, Tiruthani Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

3.P.Karthick 4.P.Vanishree 5.P.Lakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on petitioner's complaint dated 20.02.2017 against the 3,4,5 respondents herein. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Saravanan For RR1 & R2 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor For RR3 to R5 : No Appearance

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on petitioner's complaint dated 20.02.2017 against the 3,4,5 respondents.

2.

The petitioners seeks direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on petitioner's complaint dated 20.02.2017. Now, almost three years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the said prayer cannot be considered now. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition, on fresh cause of action, if so advised.

3.

With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CCC) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar pds/lok To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, D3 Kanagamma Chathiram Police Station, Tiruthani Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, High of Court, Madras.

W.P.No.6115 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.6592 of 2017 VBA(CO) SP(22/04/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/