Kasi v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Sixteenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24527 of 2021 KASI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JAMUNAMARATHUR POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT (CRIME NO.305/2021) For Petitioner : M/S S.RAJESH Advocate For Respondent : MR. N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.10.2021 for the offences under Sections 337 IPC read with 25 (1B) (a) IA Act @ into Sections 337, 307 IPC and 25(1B) (a), 27(1) IA Act, in Crime No.305 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 30.10.2021 when the defacto complainant was grazing Sheep near his village at about 12.30 noon, he heard a blasting sound and subsequently, he got injured due to bullets went off his left hand and legs. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for 45 days from 31.10.2021. Hence, he would pray for grant of bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would raise strong objection stating though the injured has been discharged from the hospital, he took treatment for 42 days and if the petitioner is released on bail, there is possibility of the petitioner tampering the evidence.
5.On seeing the grave nature of offence and the injuries sustained by the victim and also considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that there is possibility of the petitioner tampering the evidence if he is released on bail, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 16/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, THIRUVANNAMALAI 2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JAMUNAMARATHUR POLICE STATION, TIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S S.RAJESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.14880 CRL OP.24527/2021 Date :16/12/2021 RVR 29/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/