Meenakshi Sundaram @ Sundaram v. State Rep By

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.08.2018, for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120(b) r/w 109 of IPC in Crime No.1101 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the husband of the first accused and they had two children. It is alleged that the first accused had illegal relationship with this petitioner/A2 due to which, the first accused is alleged to have committed murder of her own two children with the help of this petitioner / A2. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Further, he submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 31.08.2018 and this is the eleventh bail petition. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any strigent conditions as imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner had illegal intimacy with A1 and only on instruction of this petitioner, A1 murdered her own two children. Therefore, the petitioner has committed very serious and heinous offence and hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner has committed very serious and heinous offence as against the two children and that there is no change of circumstances after the previous dismissal orders passed by this Court, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. 07.11.2022 mn

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn 07.11.2022