P. Ramesh, v. The Superintendent Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.03.2016 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.No.4503 of 2016 P.Ramesh .. Petitioner Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
2. The Inspector of Police, Land Grabbing Cell, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
3. The Inspector of Police, Vellakoil Police Station, Tiruppur District.
.. Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police, the Inspector of Police, Vellakovil Police Station, Tiruppur District, to register the petitioner complaint dated 20.11.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.C.D.Johnson For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias Addl. Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction to the third respondent to register a case pertaining to the petitioner's complaint dated 20.11.2015. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has already filed a petition in Crl.O.P.No.897 of 2016 for the above stated relief, wherein it was stated that already the matter has been enquired and closed. On the basis of the closure report, Crl.O.P.No.897 of 2016 was closed and the petitioner was given liberty to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. He further submitted that the petitioner has filed the present petition for the same relief because the petitioner entered into a sale agreement with the counter petitioners and they received Rs.13,50,000/- from the petitioner. On enquiry, it came to know that the property https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
stands in the name of some other person and even then, they have not returned the amount. But without considering the same, closure report has been passed. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
4.Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the closure report, it was specifically mentioned that the property stands in the name of the persons who entered sale agreement with the petitioner i.e., Nachammal, Ramal, Jayanthi and Perumal.
Further, in Crl.O.P.No.897 of 2016, liberty has been given to the petitioner to workout his remedy in the manner known to law. In such circumstances, I am of the view the petitioner is not entitled to re-agitate the matter before this Court once the order has been passed.
5. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above observation.
cse s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
2. The Inspector of Police, Land Grabbing Cell, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
3. The Inspector of Police, Vellakoil Police Station, Tiruppur District.
4. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Chennai.
+ 1 cc to Mr.C.D.Johnson, Advocate, SR 13118 sr(co) prk10/3 Crl.O.P.No.4503 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/