← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4539/2016granted

Chintu v. State Rep.By

2016-03-17Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram3 pages

Crl.O.P.No. 4 5 3 9 of 2 0 1 6 K. KALYANA S U NDARAM, J.

The petitioner, who is arrayed as second accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 395 of IPC in Crime No.549 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that petitioner along with others have conspired together and way laid the defacto complainant and snatched money at knife point.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the occurrence was taken place in the year 2014 and the other accused were granted bail and anticipatory bail and that the petitioner had been implicated only based on the confession of the co-accused and his name has not taken place in the FIR.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the property had not been recovered so far. It is further submitted that there is no bad antecedents against the petitioner. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, and the

fact that there is no bad antecedents against this petitioner, K.KALYANA S U NDARAM, J smi this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 1 7. 0 3. 2 0 1 6 smi

Crl.O.P.No. 4 5 3 9 of 2 0 1 6