Rajan v. T.Radhika

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR S.A.NOS.163 & 164 OF 2017 AND C.M.P.NO.3329 OF 2017 Rajan ... Appellantin both Second Appeal

Versus

1. T.Radhika

2. Thirumappa Gowder

3. Subbyan

4. Kariappan

5. Natarajan

6. Duraisamy

7. Devirammal

8. Maniammal ... Respondents in both Second Appeal Respondents 4 to 8 are already set Exparte in Courts below. Hence, they are given up in the Second Appeal. COMMON PRAYER:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, against the decree and judgment dated 14.12.2015 made in Cross Appeal No. .... of 2013 in A.S.No.61 of 2013 on the file of Sub Court, Sathiyamangalam, confirming the decree and judgement dated 14.06.2013 made in O.S.No.238 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif, Sathiyamangalam. For Appellant : No Appearance in both S.A.

For Respondents : Mr.M.Roshan Atiq for R1 in both S.A.

No Appearance for R2 Mr.M.Guruprasad for R3 RR4 to RR8 - Given up https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

Earlier the matter appeared in the list on 14.07.2021. Since there was no representation for the appellant, the appeals were directed to be listed under the caption "For dismissal". Despite the matter being listed under the caption "For dismissal", today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the appeals for non-prosecution.

Accordingly, these second appeals are dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssr To

1. The Sub Court, Sathiyamangalam.

2. The District Munsif, Sathiyamangalam.

Copy To:

The Section Offier, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras - 104.

S.A.NOS.163 & 164 OF 2017 AND C.M.P.NO.3329 OF 2017 SSV(CO) PBS/18/08/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/