← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/73/2022closed

M.Natarajan v. Priya

2023-12-19Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan,Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.12.2023

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Contempt Petition No.73 of 2022 M.Natarajan Petitioner ...vs...

1. Mrs.Priya The Tahsildar, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

2. Sadasivam (impleaded as 2nd Respondent as per the order of this Court dated 2.11.2022) Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for her disobeying the order of this Court dated 26.07.2021 made in W.P.No.13315 of 2021 1/4

For Petitioner Mr.M.Natarajan Party-in-Person For Respondents Mr.A.Selvendran (R1) Special Government Pleader Mr. Ramesh (R2) Standing counsel for Mr.T.Thiyagarajan (R2) ***

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.VAIDYANATHAN,J) This contempt petition has been preferred seeking to punish the respondents for the alleged non compliance of the order dated 26.07.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.13315 of 2021.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 1st Respondent has produced the proceedings of the Tahsildar in Na.Ka.No.461/2022/A1 dated 04.08.2023, wherein it is stated that the papers have been forwarded to the Commissioner of Land Reforms for taking appropriate decision. The said proceedings was also communicated to the concerned District Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer.

2/4

3. Since, the order passed by this Court on 26.07.2021, has been complied with by the Tahsildar, we find that no contempt is made out.

4. In view of the same, this Contempt Petition stands closed. However, we expect the authority concerned, to take final decision, with respect to the subject matter in question, without any procrastination, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the 2nd Respondent. We make it very clear that in case any of the parties is aggrieved by the final decision, they are at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (S.V.N., J.) (S.K.R., J.) 19.12.2023 arr 3/4

S. VAIDYANATHAN, J.

and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

arr Contempt Petition No.73 of 2022 19.12.2023 4/4