Ashok Kumar v. State Rep By Its

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506(i) and 34 of I.P.C 1860 in Crime No.120 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that this is a case of job racketing and the petitioner along with other accused alleged to have cheated a sum of Rs.42,00,000/- from the victims. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. Hence prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit

that this is a case of job racketing and the petitioner along with other accused alleged to have cheated a sum of Rs.42,00,000/- from the victims. Hence he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09.02.2023 smn T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

smn 09.02.2023