Baskaran v. The General Manager

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.11.2021 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.10132 of 2017 Baskaran

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The General Manager, TANSIDCO Corporate Office, Guindy Industrial Estate, Chennai-32.

2. The Deputy II General Manager, TANSIDCO Corporate Office, Guindy Industrial Estate, Chennai-32.

3. The Branch Manager, SIDCO Branch Office, Industrial, 5 Road, Salem-5.

4. The SIDCO Association, Rep. by its President, Presently Madhappan SIDCO Industrial Estate, Mettur Dam, Salem District.

... Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, seeking to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.04.2017.

For Petitioner :

Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan For R1 to R3 :

Mr.M.J.Jaseem Mohamed For R4 :

Mr.M.R.Jothimanian

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today i.e on 18.11.2021, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

that the dispute in the present case was settled, therefore, the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rst To:

1. The General Manager, TANSIDCO Corporate Office, Guindy Industrial Estate, Chennai-32.

2. The Deputy II General Manager, TANSIDCO Corporate Office, Guindy Industrial Estate, Chennai-32.

3. The Branch Manager, SIDCO Branch Office, Industrial, 5 Road, Salem-5.

+1CC to Mr.B.Kumarasamy, Advocate, Sr.No.60159 +1CC to Mr.M.J.Jaseem Mohamed, Advocate, Sr.No.59297 W.P.No.10132 of 2017 MG (CO) K.RK. (23.11.2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/