Madras High CourtCRL OP/24125/2021dismissed

Suresh @ Ramapuram Suresh v. State Represented By

2021-12-15Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24125 of 2021 SURESH @ RAMAPURAM SURESH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T-12 POONAMALLEE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

CRIME NO.153/2015.

For Petitioner : M/S.K.KANAGARAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.09.2021 for the offences under Sections 120(b), 147, 148, 353, 302 r/w 109 r/w 149 IPC, in Crime No.153 of 2015, seeks bail.

2. It is a case of jumped bail. The petitioner was arrested on 24.09.2021 pursuant to the Non Bailable Warrant issued against him.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is the case of the year 2015 and he was regularly appearing before the Court. Thereafter, the petitioner due to health issues, he was unable to appear before the Court and thereby, the learned Judge ordered Non Bailable Warrant against the petitioner following which, the petitioner was arrested on 24.09.2021 and that he has been suffering incarceration for more than 75 days from 24.09.2021. He further submitted that the petitioner is prepared to appear regularly before the trial Court and to co-operate for the trial. Hence, he seeks for grant of bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) raised objection stating that this is the case is of the year 2015 and the petitioner has got 12 previous cases and that he is not cooperating for trial proceedings and he further submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender and if the petitioner is released on bail, there is every possibility that the petitioner getting abscond and the trial would get stalled.

5.Considering the above submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and the antecedents against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 15/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, CUDDALORE.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T-12 POONAMALLEE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+2 CC to M/S.R.KALAIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.14801 CRL OP.24125/2021 Date :15/12/2021 RW 22/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/