S.Mani v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No.5127 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

The petitioners who are arrayed as accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 341, 294 (b), 324, 323 and 506 (i) of IPC, in Crime No.83 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners alleged to have waylaid the defacto complainant and abused him with filthy language and also assaulted with hand, knife and caused simple injuries. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they had been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

rgr 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Salem and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 17.03.2016 rgr Crl.O.P.No.5127 of 2016