← Library
Madras High CourtWP/26819/2025disposed of

Selvaraj v. The District Collector

2025-07-22Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-07-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Selvaraj S/o.Madhalaimuthu, "B" Block, Housing Board, Duraisamypuram, Manalvarithurai Road, Trichy-620 001.

Petitioner(s) Vs.

1. The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

2.The Tahsildhar, Veppanthattai Taluk, Perambalur.

3.The Block Development Officer, Veppanthattai Panchayat, Veppanthattai, Perambalur.

4.Arokiya Mari, D/o.Madhalaimuthu, Annamangalam, Veppanthattai Taluk, Perambalur.

Respondent(s) PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2 nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.02.2025 in pursuance of proceedings in O.Mu_COLEV-COL/ 6203/ 2025/ C2 dated 06.03.2025 in accordance with law within the stipulated time fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner:

Mr.A.Ilayaperumal For Respondents:

Mr.G.Velu, AGP for R1& R2 Mr.S.Ravichandran, AGP for R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the 2 nd respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 07.02.2025 pursuant to the proceedings dated 06.03.2025 of the 1 st respondent.

2.

Heard Mr.A.Illayaperumal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.G.Velu, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.S.Ravichandran, learned Additional Government Pleader for 3 rd respondent.

3.

The grievance of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner of the subject property and he has also put up construction. There was some damage to the superstructure and hence, the petitioner has demolished the said construction. The 4 th respondent at that point of time approached the petitioner and promised that she can get the benefit from the Government under a scheme

for constructing the house. Believing the 4 th respondent, the petitioner gave the particulars and taking advantage of the same, the 4 th respondent has received benefits for the building the house in her name under the Pradhan Manthiri Housing scheme by showing the petitioner's property. 4.

The petitioner gave a complaint in this regard to the 1 st respondent and the 1 st respondent has already forwarded the same to the 2 nd respondent for enquiry. Since there was no progress, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.

5.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of grievance expressed by the petitioner and considering the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner after affording opportunity to the 4 th respondent and take a decision, on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.

This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

22-07-2025 rka Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To:

1. The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

2.The Tahsildhar, Veppanthattai Taluk, Perambalur.

3.The Block Development Officer, Veppanthattai Panchayat, Veppanthattai, Perambalur.

4.Arokiya Mari, D/o.Madhalaimuthu, Annamangalam, Veppanthattai Taluk, Perambalur.

N.ANAND VENKATESH J.

rka 22-07-2025