← Library
Madras High CourtWP/26515/2021dismissed as infructuous

A.Elangovan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2024-01-04Honourable Ms Justice R.N.Manjula4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.01.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA W.P.

No.26515 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.27956 & 27957 of 2021 1.A.Elangovan 2.K.Thirunavukkarasu 3.A.Madurai 4.C.A.Mohanarangam

5. J.Jothi 6.J.Nirmala Devi 7.P.Annapoorani ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Director of Public Libraries, No.737/1, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to pass orders granting promotion to the petitioners to the post of Librarian Grade - II on inclusion of their names in 2016-17 on par with their juniors with all consequential and other attendant benefits, including Page No.1 of 4

arrears of salary in consideration of the representation of the petitioners within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr.R.Neethiperumal, GA

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pass orders granting promotion to the petitioners to the post of Librarian Grade - II on inclusion of their names in 2016-17 on par with their juniors with all consequential and other attendant benefits, including arrears of salary in consideration of the representation of the petitioners within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

2. Heard Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.R.Neethiperumal, learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

3. Mr.R.Neethiperumal, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that all the petitioners have been promoted except the third petitioner. Since the third petitioner did not give any Page No.2 of 4

willingness for promotion, he alone remains to be promoted.

4. The learned Government Advocate furnished the proceedings dated 27.09.2022 in which, it is stated that all the petitioners got promotion, except the third petitioner. The typed set of papers submitted by the learned Government Advocate also contains a letter given by the third petitioner in which he has stated that he is not willing to go on promotion.

5. In view of the above circumstances, nothing remains to be considered further in this Writ Petition and hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

04.01.2024 Index : Yes Internet : Yes/No Speaking / Non-speaking gsk Page No.3 of 4

R.N.MANJULA , J.

gsk To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Director of Public Libraries, No.737/1, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

W.P.No.26515 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.27956 & 27957 of 2021 04.01.2024 Page No.4 of 4