Jayanthi v. State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24772 of 2021 S.JAYANTHI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERODE SOUTH POLICE STATION, ERODE DISTRICT.
CR.NO.224 OF 2021.
For Petitioner : M/S. M.GURUPRASAD Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.BALAJI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police, for the offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii) (b) NDPS Act, 1985 in Cr.Nos.224 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the petitioner was in possession of 1200 g of Ganja and the same was seized by the respondent Police. He further submitted that this is the second bail petition filed by the petitioner and there is no change of circumstances.
3. Considering the fact that the seized Ganja material is huge in volume and further since it is a commercial quantity, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 22/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERODE SOUTH POLICE STATION, ERODE DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S. M.GURUPRASAD Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.24772/2021 Date :22/12/2021 TA-21/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/