← Library
Madras High CourtWP/28003/2025disposed of

P.Chinnaraju v. The Director General Of Police

2025-07-30Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN P.Chinnaraju ... Petitioner Vs.

1.

The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Vellore Range, Vellore District.

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for an issuance of writ of mandamus, direct the third respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Special Sub-Inspector on par with batch mates and grant such other for the relief. For Petitioner : Mr.Dhinesh Kumar for M/s.Dhineshkumar Associates For Respondents : Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader

ORDER

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

The writ petition is filed to direct the third respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Special Sub-Inspector on par with his batch mates.

The case of the petitioner is that, he was falsely implicated in the criminal case in Cr.No.77 of 2015 for the alleged offence u/s. 147, 323, 294(b), 306 IPC and later it was altered as under Section 364 (A), 347, 384, 294(b), 355, 323 & 306 IPC and subsequently, he was issued with a charge memo and imposed with punishment of dismissal from service. Challenging the said punishment, the petitioner has filed W.P.No.29968 of 2018, wherein this Court by an order dated 20.10.2021, set aside the same. Pursuant to the order of this Court, the punishment was modified into "postponement of increment for a period of three years and the period of postponement shall not operate his future increments" vide proceedings dated 10.02.2022. The main grievance of the petitioner is that, during the pendency of criminal case,

his promotion has been deferred. Now, the criminal case ended in acquittal on 31.08.2023 and the departmental proceedings also ended with minor punishment. Hence, the petitioner has sent a representation to the third respondent dated 07.05.2025, to consider him for promotion and the same is pending.

4.

Learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents would fairly submit that, the petitioner's representation will be considered on merits and in accordance with law within a reasonable time. 5.

In view of the fair submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.05.2025, and pass orders on it's own merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.

In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

30.07.2025 veda Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order To 1.

The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Vellore Range, Vellore District.

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District.

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

veda W.P.No.28003 of 2025 30.07.2025