← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/12178/2017allowed

Kanimozhi, F/Aged 26 Years, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2017-07-12Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Crl.O.P.No.12178 of 2017 Kanimozhi .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station,

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to issue a direction, directing the third respondents to register an F.I.R based on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 10.06.2017 and investigate the same in accordance with law. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Velmurugan For Respondents :

Mr.P.Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor.

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to register a case on the basis of a complaint given by the petitioner dated 10.06.2017.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a complaint given by him on 10.06.2017 to the third respondent, the same has been kept in abeyance without any action. It is well settled in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2013 (6) CTC 353], that registration of an FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if an information furnished to the police officer disclose commission of a cognizable offence and in cases where the information does not disclose a cognizable offence, a preliminary enquiry has to be conducted.

4.The respondents is not justified in having received the complaint and keeping it unattended without any further action. In view of the same, the petitioner has made out a case for this Court to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Hence, the third respondent is directed as follows: 1)If the information received by the third respondent discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then, the same shall be forthwith registered. 2)If an information received does not disclose a cognizable offence, the third respondent shall conduct a preliminary inquiry to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed therein or not and such inquiry shall be completed within a period of seven days from the date of information.

3)If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered. 4)If the preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, the disclosure report must be recorded

along with the reasonings and a copy of the same shall be furnished to the complainant within one week.

5)All information relating to cognizable offences whether resulting in registration of FIR or leading an inquiry must be reflected in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the third respondent's police station.

5.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed with the above directions.

12.07.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bsm To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station,

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

M.S.RAMESH.J, bsm Crl.O.P.No.12178 of 2017 12.07.2017