The Management v. The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.03.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.30173 of 2017 and WMP.Nos. 32789 & 32790 of 2017 The Management Sanmina SCI India Private Limited OZ-1, Sipcot Hi-Tech SEZ, Oragadam, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District - 602 105
...Petitioner
-Vs1. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.
3. Sengai Anna Maavata Jananayaga Thozhilalar Sangam, Rep. by its General Secretary.
No.4/172, National Highways, Otteri, Vandalur, Chennai-600 048.
... Respondents Prayer:
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to provide police protection and evict all the employees who propose to hold stayin- and hunger strike from inside the factory premises of the petitioner and ensure movement of staff and officers and other persons and ingress and egress of vehicles carrying finished goods and raw materials at the petitioner's premises. For Petitioner : M/s.Gupta and Ravi For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor - R1 & R2 No Appearance - for R3
ORDER
The writ petition has been filed to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to provide police protection and evict all the employees who propose to hold stay-in- and hunger strike from inside the factory premises of the petitioner and ensure movement of staff and officers and other persons and ingress and egress of vehicles carrying finished goods and raw materials at the petitioner's premises.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondents 1 &2. No Appearance on behalf of the 3rd respondent. Perused the materials available on record.
3. The petitioner seeks police protection and evict all the employees who propose to hold stay-in-hunger strike from inside the petitioner's factory premises. Now, almost two years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted now. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition, on fresh cause of action, if so advised.
4.
With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Sriperumbudur Police Station, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to M/S.Gupta & Ravi, Advocate Sr.27434 W.P.No.30173 of 2017 and WMP.Nos. 32789 & 32790 of 2017 sj[co] srg 17/06/2019