Sinna Ponnu v. Madhana Kalyani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.12.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI C.R.P.No.3646 of 2019 Sinna Ponnu .. Petitioner Vs.

1.Madhana Kalyani 2.A.Singaravelu Muthammal (Died)

3. Narasimhan 4.G.Rajendiran 5.G.Dhamodaran 6.K.Sundaramurthy 7.Asothai 8.A.Sivaprakasam 9.V.Sivakumar .. Respondents C.R.P.No.3647 of 2019 Sinna Ponnu .. Petitioner Vs.

1.Madhana Kalyani Muthammal (Died) 2.Narasimhan 1/4

3.G.Rajendiran 4.G.Dhamodaran 5.K.Sundaramurthy 6.A.Singaravelu 7.Asothai 8.A.Sivaprakasam 9.V.Sivakumar .. Respondents COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions are preferred under Section 227 of C.P.C., to set aside the order and decree dated. 09.01.2019 in EA Nos.195 & 193 of 2018 in EP.Nos.172 & 171 of 2006 in OS No.170/2000 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge at Pondicherry. For Petitioner in both CRPs : M/s.R.Rajaraman For R1 in both CRPs : Ms.G.Sumithra For R2, R3, R8 & R9 in CRP.3646/2019 : No appearance For R4 to R7 in CRP.3646/2019 : Died (Steps not taken) For R2, R6, R8 & R9 in CRP.3647/2019 : No appearance For R3 to R5 & A7 in CRP.3647/2019 : Died COMMON ORDER It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner has passed away in the year 2020 and no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner. 2/4

2.

In view of the demise of the petitioner, these Civil Revision Petitions stand dismissed as abated. However, it shall be open to the learned counsel for the petitioner to seek restoration of the revision petitions, in the event, anything survives, by filing appropriate applications to condone the delay and to set aside the abatement. 3.

Accordingly, these Civil Revision Petitions are closed. No costs.

15.12.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No rpl To The Principal Subordinate Judge, Puducherry. 3/4

P.B.BALAJI., J.

rpl 15.12.2025 4/4