Kailasam v. State By

Crl.O.P.No.5391 of 2016 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.90 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, the petitioners attacked the de facto complainant with Uruttukattai and caused injuries. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 4.Learned Government Advocate [Criminal side] appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

sms 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Attur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. 14.03.2016 sms Crl.O.P.No.5391 of 2016