← Library
Madras High CourtWMP/37640/2025dismissed

The Indian Public School, v. Aiswarya Gunasekharan,

2025-09-25Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI IN WP NO. 2726 OF 2024

1. The Indian Public School, No. 193, Sathy Road, S.S.Kulam Post, Coimbatore District.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. Aiswarya Gunasekharan, 2.The Secretary To Government, School And Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

3.The Director Of School And Education Department, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai.

4.The District Education Office, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

5.The TIPS College of Arts And Science, No. 361/1A, Karuvalur Road, MG Chettipalayam, S.S.Kulam(via), Coimbatore - 641 107.

6.The Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

7.The Director of State Council Of Educational Research And Training, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai.600 006.

Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of Indian Constitution to clarify the order dated 20.09.2024 made in W.P. No 2726 of 2024.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. TKS. Muthukumaran For Respondent(s):

Mr. K. Prabhakaran For R1.

ORDER

The above miscellaneous petition has been filed by the fourth respondent in W.P.No.2726 of 2024 praying to clarify the order of this Court dated 20.09.2024, in W.P.No.2726 of 2024.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner /4 th respondent would submit that the writ petitioner had approached them for refund of fees, pursuant to the directions of this Court, inter alia, directed the writ petitioner to approach the 4 th and 5 th respondents for refund of fees. The learned counsel would further submit that the 4 th and 5 th respondent are different entities and they are not administered under same Management. According to the petitioner, it is the 5 th respondent who had collected the fees and the writ petitioner ought to have approached the 5 th respondent for refund of fees.

3. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. Admittedly, this Court had directed the 4 th and 5 th respondent to refund the entire fees to the petitioner, which was collected from her during her admission to BBA Course in 5 th respondent-College. When the case was taken up for hearing, it was represented that the 4 th and 5 th respondents are administered by the same Management, and the learned counsel who represented the 4 th & 5 th respondents before this Court, are one and same. Therefore, based on the representation made by the learned counsels who appeared on both sides on 20.09.2024, this Court passed the order in W.P.No.2726 of 2024. Hence, this Court records there is no ambiguousness in the order of this Court dated 20.09.2024, which requires a clarification in the present WMP.

4.Accordingly, this miscellaneous petition is dismissed. 25-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ds

To:

1.The Secretary To Government, School And Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Director Of School And Education Department, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai.

3.The District Education Office, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

5.The TIPS College Of Arts And Science, No. 361/1A, Karuvalur Road, MG Chettipalayam, S.S.Kulam(via), Coimbatore - 641 107.

6.The Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

7.The Director Of State Council Of Educational Research And Training DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

M.DHANDAPANI J.

ds in WP NO. 2726 OF 2024 25-09-2025