← Library
Madras High CourtWP/29191/2025withdrawn dismissed

P.Krishnan v. The District Collector

2025-08-06Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. SUNDAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No.29191 of 2025 P. Krishnan Petitioner vs.

1.

The District Collector O/o.The District Collectorate Building Ranipet District The Chief Engineer Public Works Department Water Resources Organisation Ezhilagam Chepauk Chennai 600 005 The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o. The Revenue Divisional Office Ranipet District The Tahsildar Sholingar Taluk Office Sholingar Taluk Ranipet District 5.

Mani @ Subramani Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the encroachment made by the 5th respondent in the land i.e., comprised in S.No.86/1 situated at Koothambakkam Village, Arakkonam Taluk presently Sholingur Taluk, Vellore District based on petitioner's representation dated 30.06.2025 within a time frame. 1/4

For petitioner Mr. K. Mukesh Kumar

ORDER

(made by M. SUNDAR, J.) Captioned 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus [to be noted, mandamus qua Removal of Encroachment (RoE)] and the prayer is predicated on writ petitioner's representation dated 30.06.2025 [hereinafter 'said representation' for the sake of convenience and clarity].

Aforereferred said representation is addressed to R1 (District Collector) though copies have been marked to respondents 2 to 4. There is no paper to demonstrate that said representation has been served on first respondent.

Faced with the above situation, Mr. K. Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned WP but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of writ petitioner to come to this Court or approach any other appropriate Court/fora on the same cause of action with requisite papers. This request of learned counsel for writ petitioner is acceded to.

2/4

Scanned reproduction of endorsement made by learned counsel on record for writ petitioner on the case file is as follows: 5.

Captioned WP stands disposed of as closed/withdrawn, albeit with preservation of rights and contentions in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.

(M.S., J.) (T.V.K., J.) 06.08.2025 cad Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No 3/4

M. SUNDAR, J.

and T. VINOD KUMAR, J.

cad To:

1.

The District Collector O/o.The District Collectorate Building Ranipet District The Chief Engineer Public Works Department Water Resources Organisation Ezhilagam Chepauk Chennai 600 005 The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o.The Revenue Divisional Office Ranipet District The Tahsildar Sholingar Taluk Office Sholingar Taluk Ranipet District 06.08.2025 4/4