Madras High CourtCRL OP/24875/2021dismissed

M.Dinesh v. The Inspector Of Police,

2021-12-17Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Seventeenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.24875 of 2021 1 M.DINESH [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 KAVITHA Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, [ RESPONDENT ] DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, CHINNA EKKADU, JAYA NAGAR, THIRUVALLUR - 602001.

(CRIME NO.50/2021) For Petitioner : M/S.J.YAMINI JAI DIVYA Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.KOKULAKRISHNAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420, 406, 417 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Crime No.50 of 2021 on the file of the respondent seeks anticipatory bail.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners induced the defacto complainant and collected a sum of Rs.84,65,000/- from the defacto complainant that he will get medical Medical Seats in Saveetha College for his son and for his son's friend. Thereby, he provided fake confirmation letter and cheated the money. Hence, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the Law Enforcing Agency.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that more than Rs.84,00,000/- was involved and the investigation is at initial stage. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Considering that the investigation is pending and also considering that if the petitioners released on bail they may tamper the evidence. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. -sd/- 17/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, CHINNA EKKADU, JAYA NAGAR, THIRUVALLUR - 602001.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.J.YAMINI JAI DIVYA Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.24875/2021 Date :17/12/2021 CSK 05/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/