Vanaja v. The State Represented By Its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.09.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Vanaja ... Petitioner/Wife of the Detenue Vs.

1.

The State represented by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Puzhal Range, Chennai.

The Superintendent, Puzhal Central Prison, Chennai.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 40 days without escort to the detenue, Kamesh Kumar S/o. Venu aged about 41 years bearing Convict No.5666 confined at Central Prison, Puzhal.

For Petitioner : Ms.S.Sadhana For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Mr.E.Raj Thilak, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the process has been undertaken and two weeks time may be granted for passing orders on the leave application submitted by the petitioner.

In view of the above submission, the respondents are directed to dispose of the leave application submitted by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. [S.M.S., J.] [V.S.G., J.] 10.09.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order veda

To 1.

The State represented by its, The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Puzhal Range, Chennai.

The Superintendent, Puzhal Central Prison, Chennai.

3.

The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai - 104.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

veda 10.09.2024