Malar v. The State Rep. By Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-09-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
1. Malar W/o Pandiyan, No.509/60, KatheriPrivu, Bharathi Estate, Kumarapalyam, Namakkal District
2. Priya @ Jayapriya D/o Jayamurugan, KovilStreet, Theruveedi, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District
3. Mahendran S/o Mani, No. 16/1-131A, Samrajpettai East Street, Samrajpettai, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District
4. Dharani @ Nithish Kumar S/o Pandiyan, KaliyammanKovil, VTC, Mecheri Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District
5. Chithra @ Sithra W/o Selvam, D.No. 1/71, Kukkalpatti, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District
6. Nithish @ Nithish kumar
S/o Saravanan, No. 17/1-74, Arasamarathusanthu Street, Subash Nagar, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District
7. Ratha @ Radha W/o Saravanan , No.268, 15-17, Subash Nagar, Samrajpettai Post, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep. By Inspector of Police Thevoor Police Station, Salem District.
(Crime. No. 183/2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest a case in crime no.183 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent For Petitioner(s):
Deepak Kumar C D.Gnanasoundari For Respondent(s):
Mr. S. Udayakumar, Government Advocate Crl.side
ORDER
This petition has been filed to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest a case in crime no.183 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is running a private company namely PGT enterprises, who was engaged in the construction of a house and concrete slab was completed, the A1 approached the defacto complainant to construct house in his place. A1's daughter had leased the land for the construction, the A1's loan amount was cancelled by advance was cancelled by bank the defacto complainant given Rs.3 lakhs as an advance for concrete and for other construction materials. When the defacto complainant asked his money back the petitioners threatened him and broke defacto complainant's house window and car and also abused him in filthy languages. Thereafter, Based on the complaint of the defacto complainant the respondent police registered FIR in crime No. 183 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 191(2), 118(1), 296(b), 329(4) and 324 BNS.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate submits that the investigation is almost completed.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the investigation is almost completed. Hence, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- to the credit of crime No. 183 of 2025, on such deposit, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sankari, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction
of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.00 a.m for a a period of 8 weeks. If the petitioners failed to deposit the above said amount, the bail will be canceled automatically. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
Post on 16.10.2025 for reporting compliance.
09-09-2025 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sankari
2. The Inspector of Police Thevoor Police Station, Salem District.
Note :-
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the Official Website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR Code.
T.V.THAMILSELVI J.
CRL OP No. 20964 of 09-09-2025